An Inside Look at World War II's Bloodiest Battle

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
A German historian has published a collection of unusually candid interviews with members of the Red Army that provides the first precise account of the battle of Stalingrad from the perspective of ordinary soldiers. They show that this chapter in history deserves a reappraisal.


At dawn on Jan. 31, 1943, the bloodiest battle of World War II came to an end for the top German commander in Stalingrad. Russian soldiers stood at the entrance to the basement of the Univermag department store in which the top-ranking German officers, including supreme commander Friedrich Paulus, had taken refuge. One day earlier, Adolf Hitler had promoted the leader of the German troops in Stalingrad to the rank of field marshal -- not so much as a sign of recognition as an implicit order to end his life rather than allow himself to be captured.


Lieutenant Colonel Leonid Vinokur was the first to catch sight of Paulus: "He lay on the bed when I entered. He lay there in his coat, with his cap on. He had two-week-old beard stubble and seemed to have lost all courage." The final hideout of the commander of the German 6th Army resembled a latrine. "The filth and human excrement and who knows what else was piled up waist-high," Major Anatoly Zoldatov went on record as saying, adding: "It stank beyond belief. There were two toilets and signs above them both that read: 'No Russians allowed'." It was only after a while that the Germans were forced to hand over their weapons. "They could have easily shot themselves," said Major General Ivan Burmakov. But Paulus and his staff chose not to do that. "They had no intention of dying -- they were such cowards. They didn't have the courage to die," said eyewitness Burmakov.



more

A New Version of Events

Frank Interviews With Red Army Soldiers Shed New Light on Stalingard - SPIEGEL ONLINE
 

The Old Medic

Council Member
May 16, 2010
1,330
2
38
The World
These interviews do not necessarily provide truth. They are recollections, from many years later, that may well have been influenced by many factors.

Also, do those Russians explain why the Soviet Union sent back to Germany approximately 1 out of 10 Germans that they captured during the war? And NONE of them were released until 10 years after the war ended? Or that Paulus and his officers were executed in Moscow?
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
Locutus... Is that the Stalingrad monument in your avatar?

These interviews do not necessarily provide truth. They are recollections, from many years later, that may well have been influenced by many factors.

Also, do those Russians explain why the Soviet Union sent back to Germany approximately 1 out of 10 Germans that they captured during the war? And NONE of them were released until 10 years after the war ended? Or that Paulus and his officers were executed in Moscow?

There really is nothing to explain. The war on the Eastern Front was pretty much a war of no quarter. The Nazi's set that tone at the outset. How could they expect anything less?

And Paulus survived the war and was returned to (East) Germany in 1953 and died in 1957.





 

Nuggler

kind and gentle
Feb 27, 2006
11,596
140
63
Backwater, Ontario.
These interviews do not necessarily provide truth. They are recollections, from many years later, that may well have been influenced by many factors.

Also, do those Russians explain why the Soviet Union sent back to Germany approximately 1 out of 10 Germans that they captured during the war? And NONE of them were released until 10 years after the war ended? Or that Paulus and his officers were executed in Moscow?


Why do they need to explain. ?

I would have summarily executed any German over the rank of Sergeant.

The 1 out of 10 thingy was probably gleaned from the knowledge of what the Germans did to Soviet prisoners and civilians.

Stalin starved millions of his own. Worked to death millions more. .

war is hell.

go figure.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
Stalin starved millions of his own. Worked to death millions more. .

No kidding. What did the Germans expect knowing Stalin did that to his own people. The Germans showed little mercy and got very little in return.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA

If I remember correctly... didn't Genghis crush Russia?

Two fronts didn't help the Nazi cause either. Good thing.

Russia wasn't too kind to Napoleon either.

Two fronts didn't help. I am of the opinion that the Soviets would have eventually beat them on their own. The Soviet armies were enormous and highly capable once they over came the initial shock of Operation Barbarossa. The Battle of Stalingrad was when Stalin said not one more step back or the famous line...

"There is no land behind the Volga!"
 

Nuggler

kind and gentle
Feb 27, 2006
11,596
140
63
Backwater, Ontario.
If I remember correctly... didn't Genghis crush Russia?



Two fronts didn't help. I am of the opinion that the Soviets would have eventually beat them on their own. The Soviet armies were enormous and highly capable once they over came the initial shock of Operation Barbarossa. The Battle of Stalingrad was when Stalin said not one more step back or the famous line...

"There is no land behind the Volga!"



True enough. My point was that if Hitler hadn't decided on two fronts, WE would have had a harder time of it. Maybe lost.

Yes DB... now go play and let the adults chat.


..........ouch........
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Yes DB... now go play and let the adults chat.

The best thing about old people like you is the rapidly approaching expiration dates.